Thursday, March 30, 2006

A question to anyone who can answer.

If you say that what the House of Represenatives passes or agrees upon is invalid because they are only the first people to pass judgement on a bill or law, does that mean we should get rid of the House? Is a group of elected people necessary if they are only the first step in our government? Does this mean that the Senate is unnecessary because they are technically the first ones to see the document that count... and if so this means that they too are unneccessary because they are the first ones to say or pass judgement that has any relivance to our country. So our president saying that to the reporter from CNN EN ESPANIOL, that the House of Represenatives is an unusable source for judging whether or not a bill will be passed, means that he is the only person who matters in our government and that all others are invalid to make decisions. This also negates his past as a governor and states that he is an invalid leader because he only became president... and was not born into the possition... Should we go back to devine right? Should we start praying to Gods and giving human sacrafices so that our new Pharoh will allow immigration and abortions? Should we all just put our heads between our legs and kiss our ass goodbye? Should I just move to Siberia and live with the peasants of old?

1 Comments:

Blogger DS Irvin said...

I think divine right still exists in Siberia. Just a thought.

Wait, don't we have divine right right now? GW was elected because god wanted to fight the a-rabs

April 02, 2006 4:11 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home